Furcal could be the Cardinals answer at shortstop
By COREY NOLES
While nothing has been said about Rafael Furcal returning to the St. Louis Cardinals, if the right deal doesn't come along it could be the smartest option.
The free agent market for this year is extremely slim--and there's little doubt GM John Mozeliak would rather spend dollars (which they have) than prospects (which they cherish.)
Rumors have circulated about the Cardinals and Boston Red Sox shortstop Stephen Drew, but since they have given him a qualified offer, it's quite likely he will accept it.
Even if Drew doesn't accept it, he may still go for a price and numbers of years beyond a range the Cardinals would view as reasonable.
With his injury history, three years would be a stretch to give for Drew.
Among the other free agents available are Jhonny Peralta and Brendan Ryan.
Peralta's 2013 numbers would make him a solid fit, there's still a chance the Detroit Tigers could hang on to him as an outfielder. With that said, such a fit with the Tigers seems unlikely having traded for Jose Iglesias.
Most likely, he will be looking for a multi-year deal upwards of $6 million. That doesn't put him out of reach for the Cardinals, but would likely be reluctant to pick up a player fresh off of a PED suspension.
Brendan Ryan is also available, but they already tried that. Great glove, no bat. In fact, Ryan batted 20 points lower than Pete Kozma.
In the end, the answer could come with a year (or half year) from Furcal. Here are a few thoughts on the subject.
1. Furcal will need a one-year deal. Coming off of a season ending operation, Furcal will need to prove to teams that he can still play at the level he once did before anyone will even dream of taking a chance on him. Why not let him do that in St. Louis? When he's healthy, Furcal is one of the best shortstops in the National League.
During his 171 games as a Cardinal, Furcal batted .262 overall--his career low. While those numbers won't win a Silver Slugger Award, they are a 45-point increase over Kozma. With a full season's rest behind him, he should be rejuvenated.
Sure, it's a gamble, but every signing is a gamble. One-year could be a gamble worth taking if the right deal doesn't present itself.
2. The price should be very reasonable. With the Cardinals having paid Furcal $14M over the past two seasons, odds are that they could get him for a considerably smaller price.
As it stands, I wouldn't expect more than a $4M deal for him. The Cardinals have the money and if he is, in fact, healthy, the Cardinals could see a huge return for the money. If it goes poorly, they're only out a small contract for one year.
3. A Furcal signing wouldn't cost any prospects or draft picks. This is a key advantage for the front office. Signing Drew, for example, would cost the Cardinals a draft pick because he was given a qualifying offer.
Since Furcal is also a free agent, he could be picked up without having to make a trade. Any team the Cardinals want to trade with will obviously be chasing their top-end young pitchers.
While the Cardinals might be willing to make such a move for the right piece, if that piece doesn't come along this could be a safe route.
4. This would buy another year to wait for a better crop of free agents. The free agent crop for this season is fairly weak at shortstop, but next year is very different.
Following the 2014 season, the list of free agent shortstops looks like this: Mike Aviles, Asdrubal Cabrera, J.J. Hardy, Jed Lowrie, Hiroyuki Nakajima, Hanley Ramirez and Jimmy Rollins.
Not only are most of those big names, the fact that so many will be available means the market should be saturated with shortstops which is good for management.
While waiting might not be a viable option, if Mozeliak chooses to wait the crop is much more attractive.
5. He's already a part of this team. One advantage to bringing Furcal back is that he's been an important part of this team for quite some time. While he wasn't around as much in 2013, he had a lot to do with the clubhouses light, jovial atmosphere in 2011.
Since he's already been around for awhile, there's no concern about bringing in a guy who is a plague to the clubhouse.
As I pointed out earlier, it's entirely possible this might not be a workable deal to begin with because it hinges on several things: his ability to play shortstop, whether he would be ready for Opening Day and the cost other teams/shortstops are seeking.
It's not the definitive answer, but it is a possibility. Keep an open mind as the hot stove season gets underway because you never know what could happen.
--
Corey Noles is a Cardinals Writer and Columnist for The Daily Statesman. He is also a regular contributor to KSDK.com, StLSportsPage.com, GammonsDaily.com and Bleacher Report. Contact him at cnoles@dailystatesman.com or on Twitter @coreynoles.
Comments
- -- Posted by Jolly Dump on Sat, Nov 2, 2013, at 11:05 AM
- -- Posted by Bunk on Sat, Nov 2, 2013, at 2:02 PM
- -- Posted by Preacher Man Fan on Sat, Nov 2, 2013, at 2:14 PM
- -- Posted by ThayerPops on Sat, Nov 2, 2013, at 2:24 PM
- -- Posted by sideline starter on Sat, Nov 2, 2013, at 2:44 PM
- -- Posted by Bunk on Sat, Nov 2, 2013, at 2:56 PM
- -- Posted by crackerjack on Sat, Nov 2, 2013, at 3:11 PM
- -- Posted by Bunk on Sat, Nov 2, 2013, at 3:34 PM
- -- Posted by SportsMediaInformant on Sat, Nov 2, 2013, at 8:02 PM
- -- Posted by gianthook on Sat, Nov 2, 2013, at 10:04 PM
- -- Posted by Bunk on Sat, Nov 2, 2013, at 10:33 PM
- -- Posted by Preacher Man Fan on Sat, Nov 2, 2013, at 10:44 PM
- -- Posted by gianthook on Sun, Nov 3, 2013, at 12:03 AM
- -- Posted by Dustin Ward on Sun, Nov 3, 2013, at 1:43 AM
- -- Posted by Dustin Ward on Sun, Nov 3, 2013, at 1:44 AM
- -- Posted by Bunk on Sun, Nov 3, 2013, at 8:13 AM
- -- Posted by crackerjack on Sun, Nov 3, 2013, at 12:38 PM
- -- Posted by CARDINALMAN48 on Sun, Nov 3, 2013, at 8:13 PM
Respond to this blog
Posting a comment requires free registration:
- If you already have an account, follow this link to login
- Otherwise, follow this link to register