I, also, do not condone any kind of racial slander, WHATSOEVER! I will put my opinion on that subject upon whoever I hear say it (especially if my kids are around). That includes my family or a stranger on the street, no matter what their race or ethnicity. As far as what Dog did, I think his son should be sued in some form or fashion. It was a private conversation that took place in the privacy of Dog's home. Having your voice recorded in certain situations isn't even admissible in a court of law. So how can this hold up?

I KNOW I have said things in my own home that I wouldn't want ANYONE else hearing. But that is why I said them in my home! You make such a good point Sacha...keep up the great blogging.

This isn't an entertainer making public rascist remarks,it's someone saying I am not rascist,but we use rascist slurs when we are in private,don't tape us and sell the tape to the Enquirer,we should not have to censor ourselves.

Isn't the law in many states,including our own,only one party has to know they are being taped?(That only has to be the person doing the taping,as long as they are part of the conversation).I never was much into Mullet Man,but he seems to have hit the nail on the head,why should he and his family lose everything because they caught this girl trying to tape them in their private time?

Dog is an ex-con,he works with a rough bunch,wow,he doesn't sound like Joel Osteen in reality-why is anybody surprised? He and his brood have filthy mouths,dress weird,chain smoke around little kids,he has all these kids he never raised,(so he may have paid child support,but was neglectful with their raising)but why are people acting so surprised one he didn't raise stabbed him in the back?

He should have listened to his own rant,and he wouldn't be in this mess.

I agree with your comments regarding the personal life of Mr. Chapman being exactly that, his personal life. I guess I have mellowed as I gained a mature age, I am 64 years old. I retired from the LA County Sheriff's Department. You would think I would look down on Mr. Chapman's activities. Most of my retired friends have made comments regarding Mr. Chapman.

I think bounty hunting is a necessary evil. With out that job designation there would be thousands of individuals, who have jumped bail, thumbing their collective noses at the system. Flawed it might be, but without the bail system allowing the Bounty Hunters to do their job, there is a likely that there would be no bail system at all.

I have written A&E and expressed my opinion of their attempt to cover their collective backsides. Mr. Chapman, although possibly a closet racist, has the right to his opinion and when given the background that it was a betrayal by his own son that has now been facilitated by A&E and others, all I can say is shame on you. If this trend continues we truly will have the thought police among us.

John Sipes

A person MUST be able to have total freedom in his own home! That's one issue. If he hurts someone or commits a crime, that's a separate issue. If he holds himself up to be a hero and savior of lost souls, but holds bigotry in his heart, that's another issue. This is a complicated, multi-leveled situation. Bottom line: Brother, know thyself. I think there is major denial going on here, saying "I love Black people" ... and all the spin tactics. Dog & Beth are rednecks - classic. They don't mean a lot of the slurs, but they don't take the trouble to understand what any kind of slur IS and DOES to both the person holding that reality in their heart, and the people affected by such energy. It's detrimental to all. Sorry, Chapmans ... the piper is calling. Yes, they did a lot of good things, but they also got hero treatment when they didn't deserve it. The ride is over - truth is out - no amount of spin can replace honesty and self-understanding. There is absolutely no place for bigotry in this day and age ... let's be an example of that reform.