A last resort

In June the U.S. Supreme Court decision Kelo v. the City of New London sounded an alarm heard nationwide by citizens concerned about private property rights. Legislative action at the state and federal levels is taking shape in response to the public's shock and dismay over the Court's finding in support of the use of eminent domain to condemn homes and businesses for economic development projects.

At the federal level, Congress is considering prohibiting the use of eminent domain by the federal government for economical development purposes and withholding federal funding from state and local governments that use eminent domain for such purposes.

In Missouri a task force appointed by Governor Matt Blunt will complete its work by the end of the year on recommended changes in state law relating to eminent domain. The task force has heard from interests on all sides of the issue, including property owners whose homes, farms, and businesses have been taken in whole or in part for either economic development or public infrastructure.

Eminent domain has its place as a "last resort" when basic public services, such as utilities and roads, cannot otherwise be provided where needed. But even under these circumstances, property owners' rights must be protected.

The task force recommendations are likely to address eminent domain abuse in property takings for economic development and public infrastructures purposes. When Missouri General Assembly convenes in January, eminent domain reform will be a top priority for many state lawmakers. But the powers that be with eminent domain at their disposal can be pervasive. Eminent domain reform is well on its way in Missouri, and Farm Bureau will continue to sound the alarm until the job is done.

Charles Kruse, a fourth generation farmer from Dexter, serves as president of the Missouri Farm Bureau, the states's largest farm organization.