Login | Register
Overcast ~ 71°F  
[Dexter Daily Statesman]
Dexter, Missouri ~ Monday, October 13, 2008
Print Email link Respond to editor Read comments (4)

Pickering requests change of venue

Thursday, December 6, 2007

BLOOMFIELD-Steve Walsh, attorney for Curtis Pickering, filed a motion this week for a change of venue.

The motion was taken up Wednesday by Judge Stephen Sharp and has been sent to the Missouri Supreme Court to assign a special judge. That judge will then come to Stoddard County and hear the motion for change of venue.

Pickering, 28 of South Fulton, Tenn., was arrested in connection with an. Oct. 21 early morning raid on a residence in rural Stoddard County.

He faces two charges of the class d felony of dog fighting. The charges are punishable by up to 5 years in prison for each charge.

Two of the dog's seized in the raid have been attributed to Pickering as a result of an interview with the owner of the property, Jamie D. Sifford of Dudley who has also been charged.

Pickering's attorney Steve Walsh said last week that he felt the case against his client was very thin and maintained Pickering's innocence.

Authorities found a video tape that claim shows Pickering, and one of the dogs seized, fighting at his residence in Tenn.

Law enforcement officials in Tenn. Have said that Pickering will face separate charges at home in relation to evidence found at his residence. A grand jury will convene in January when that decision will be made.

Pickering remains in Stoddard County Jail for a bond of $50,000.

Sifford's bond is set at $125,000 and he also remains in jail. Jessey Short, 30 of Cape Girardeau, posted a $125,000 bond on Nov. 2.

Short and Sifford will return to the courtroom on Thursday, Dec. 10 at 1:30 p.m.

See related story on page 3 of today's edition.


Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable.

I will answer the question for you. No, jamie does not have a bond or he would be at home for the birth of his baby on dec. the nineteenth....

-- Posted by denene on Sat, Dec 8, 2007, at 12:33 AM

"Out of pocket" is a quaint phrase.

-- Posted by goat lady on Thu, Dec 6, 2007, at 9:10 PM

Corey,

another well known case that you used to follow is the Jason Merrill case. His attorney, also Walsh, filed a motion for change of venue and it was granted. Mr. Walsh is very busy working for the criminals of the state. He just recently filed another motion on behalf of his client, Mr. Merrill, and it will also be heard on Dec. 10. It will be in Jackson.

-- Posted by aubuchon on Thu, Dec 6, 2007, at 1:01 PM
Response by Corey:
I'm still watching this case, too. Not much has happened in a while though.

Corey-Can you tell me if it is a mistake or does Jamie Sifford really have a bond set? Also, has his court date been changed from Dec. 19 to Dec. 10? Thanks

-- Posted by youcandlebox on Thu, Dec 6, 2007, at 11:53 AM
Response by Corey:
So far as I can tell, his court date is still set for Dec. 19. If there is any change or if I find out otherwise I'll pass it along.

About the bond issue, the original warrant called for $125,000 bond. Probation violations are another story, though. Typically, it's been my experience that there is no bond with those cases. This could be different, though. I'm not sure. There's a big event in Poplar Bluff this afternoon and the people I would ask are out of pocket. I'll keep checking.



Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration. If you already have an account on this site, enter your username and password below. Otherwise, click here to register.

Username:

Password:  (Forgot your password?)

Your comments:
Please be respectful of others and try to stay on topic.

Mailing list
Enter your email address to join our daily headline mailing list:
Text Alerts  
Daily Statesman e-Edition

Young GMAC Real Estate

Trammell