![]() |
| Photo courtesy of MSHP - Ingredients used in the manufacture of meth are displayed following a recent bust of a lab in Southeast Missouri by the SEMO Drug Task Force. Task Forces across the country are facing budget cuts that will threaten their existence by 2010. |
As of May 31 of this year, a total of 2,635 meth labs have been seized in the U.S. by members of Drug Task Forces across the country. Six-hundred-sixty-five of those labs were seized in Missouri. Missouri and its adjoining states account for 55 percent of the total number of meth lab incidents in the country.
In spite of laws regulating and restricting the sale of ingredients used in the manufacture of methamphetamine, the problem remains a constant issue within the ranks of local and neighboring Drug Task Forces.
And yet, armed with the above figures and inundated with data supporting the work of the Drug Task Force, the federal budget which feeds the lifeline of the organizations across the nation, has been dramatically slashed.
"We've been cut to the bone in this year's approved budget," Glaser reports, " to the tune of a 60 to 70 percent funding cut and there is quite simply no way that our department can survive that kind of deficit in funding. No business that I know of could remain in operation with a cut like this."
"Missouri operates on an annual budget," says Glaser, "of just over $5 million, and for the past several years, our budget has been cut from 10 to 20 percent each year."
There are 26 Drug Task Forces in the state of Missouri and of those, nine are Highway Patrol governed. They are not, however, funded by the Highway Patrol.
"We've cut back and diminished our forces to accommodate these cuts, but with this slash in the operating funds of the Task Force, we will fold after a year of operation."
Task Forces across the country have annually been funded through money from the Byrne/JAG Grant.
Byrne/Jag came into existence in November of 2004 when Congress consolidated two long-standing local law enforcement grant programs, establishing one grant through which federal authorities may support federal, state and local efforts to fight crime and in many instances, specifically drug-related crime.
In a letter to law enforcement personnel involved in the war against drugs across Missouri, Jason J. Grellner, president of the state's Narcotic Officers Association, told officers, "The effects of this cut will be felt by all task forces on July 1, 2009. I know that this (budget cut) would mean the end to numerous task forces throughout the state. At a time when we are seeing some real progress in the fight against drugs, such as cocaine and methamphetamine, this is truly disheartening."
No one knows better locally just how disheartening the news of the cuts can be than Kevin Glaser. He has been a member of the Highway Patrol since 1983 and has headed up the SEMO Task Force since its inception in 1990. He has witnessed firsthand the successful work of his officers and has watched them daily put their lives on the line in order to keep drugs off the street and out of the hands of Southeast Missouri's youth.
"What is really disheartening in all of this is to realize that while cutting the funding some 60-70 percent for drug task forces," he says, "money is being granted internationally to police activities in places from Mexico to the West Bank."
Indeed, according to Senior Manager for Government Affairs Elizabeth Pyke, the same federal budget that slashes U.S. funding for Drug Task Forces, grants over one billion dollars internationally. Specifically, $603 million has been allocated for the Iraqi police (for wartime training), $350 million for the Mexican police, another $10 million for the Sudanese and up to $50 million to the West Bank police. An additional $100 million, says Pyke, will be issued to the countries of Central America, Haiti and the Dominican Republic."
While the monies allocated to the foreign police does not derive from the Bryne/JAG Grant, the decision to fund those efforts and yet slash what Pyke refers to as, "the cornerstone crime fighting program" within the U.S. is, at best, disappointing, Glaser reiterates.
Now, in an effort to sustain the work of Task Forces across the state, law enforcement agencies are urging state government to consider picking up the slack that the federal budget has left
"Narcotics crimes impact all other crimes and there is no doubt that if the Drug Task Force as we know it dissolves," Glaser says, "we will be witnessing an influx of drug activity within our communities."
Local law enforcement agencies would, Glaser explains, be forced to take over the duties of fighting drug crime.
"While their efforts are noble ones, " he says, "they do not have the manpower, the equipment or the education within the field, to do the work at the level this the state's Task Forces are now performing."
"Illegal drug overdoses kill 30,000 American each year," National Narcotic Officers' Associations' Coalition (NNOAC) Robert E. Brooks, said an address to the Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. House of Representatives in Washigton, D.C. in late May of this year. "Some government officials work on the theory that they have needed to shift funding to protect the homeland and terrorist activities. Of course, it is important to fund preparedness and response capacity, but that shift has come at the expense of the drug enforcement mission."
The fate of the SEMO Task Force, along with such agencies across Missouri and the country, is not entirely sealed as yet, Glaser cautiously states.
"If Missouri can obtain adequate backing from the state level," he says, "then we can remain in operation from July1, 2009 through June of 2010. After that time, it's our hope that funding will once again pick up from the federal level. If not, the Drug Task Forces as we know them, will cease to exist."
And that, says, Sgt. Kevin Glaser, would be a crime.

















I think the point is being missed and the discussion has gotten way off base. I understand what you've said about the DEA, but do you realize that DEA has very few agents in this area and they are based out of Cape? Who do you all think does the majority of drug related search warrants, the undercover operations and the daily investigations. Local police and sherriff's departments deal with calls, traffic violations,etc and they do not have the time or manpower to devote just to drug issues. Dexter (and sourrounding areas alike) is a good town, but there is a large drug problem and not just with the "poor" or with meth. Prescription drugs are the biggest thing right now and when one of your kids is strung out to the hilt, are you going to call a DEA agent in to bust the small time dealer to make them stop? Good luck because they only take cases of a much larger magnitude. The task force does so much work that the general public does not even realize because they don't want their faces and where they are too known. It would be a shame to lose such an organization from our community.
As much respect as I have for Kevin and the men and women of the SEMO DTF, a review of the court records, DOC populations and roles of those who continue to go through the system time after time, the "War on Drugs" has accomplished nothing as there are as many if not more individuals addicted as when the DTF began. I would just as soon these monies go to DEA as the sentencing guidelines are much more strict than those of Missouri. And yes, I am aware that many of these cases they make are picked up by the Feds, but let the DEA do the leg work too.
Yeah......way to tell 'em Pig Souey. That was awesome. Great job cultivating the wonderful careers of Bill and Hillary Clinton, a couple of white trash pieceO's taking advantage of the poor and dumb all the way to DC. Back on the subject, military mom, we weren't calling for taking away the poor and the dumb, i.e. arkansas boy, from their parents, we were calling for the limitation of the breeding of the poor and the dumb. Pay attention.
Well is seem all you so called Conservatives have it figured out around Dexter. Maybe you should go to D.C. and help Bush cause he needs it.
I don't think taking poor peoples kids away will solve anything, especially when there is so many jobs being closed and going overseas or to Mexico. However I do know that Meth is a major problem and the thing someone on here wasn't thinking about when they said let them blow themselves up, well what about the innocent kids and others in the area that don't make it or deal it. They get hurt and it's not necessarily, the poor whose making and using these drugs. The only reason you hear about the poor is the rich have lawyers who are paid to get them out of trouble. It reaches everyone not just a select few poor people.
Let all the meth makers do as they please. Let them all have meth mouths and rot their teeth out...it will help starving dentists. Let them all overdose...it will alleviate the tax payers burden into the unjust welfare system. Let them all get drunk and high and blow themselves up making the stuff. I am sooooo laughing as I think of these wonderful things.
I got something to say
I killed your baby today
and it, doesn't matter much to me
as long as it's dead
Misleading Story.....President Barrack Hussein Obama is going to save America. Heard so today in his speech in Germany. Don't worry about any programs being cut. He knows how to fund them all!
We would also improve society by redistributing the poor and unwanted to families that desperately want to have kids, but cannot. Growing up in a good environment would help many of the problems we continue to face. It's a shame we haven't taken steps to improve the adoption process; to the point where parents are looking to foreign countries for adoption options.
I think Layne Staley got it right. ....we need to limit the breeding of the poor and dumb in order to tackle large problems like the ones you just mentioned.
I need to re phrase something: I meant to say there are tougher laws and penalties for people convicted of selling or manufacturing drugs and they seem to get more jail time than child molesters or even some murderers. I know of a man that "accidentally" killed his 7 month old baby ( shook him to death) and he only served 18 months in jail. I know of some people who have served 5 or more years for selling drugs. Just seems messed up to me.
They may as well legalize meth and pot. If a person wants to throw their life away staying high then let them. The problem is that many drug dealers will sell to anyone, including kids. That's the real crime. I think it is a shame that there are tougher drug laws and stiffer penalties for child molesters or even murderers. "Illegal drug overdoses kill 30,000 American each year", I don't dispute this but a good number of people die each year from smoking cigarettes or eating so much that they die from health related issues like diabetes and heart disease. A large number die from alcohol related issues too including drunk driving. The war on drugs is just part of the problem.