Tasty Grill Cafe
Dexter, Missouri · Saturday, November 21, 2009
[SeMissourian.com] Overcast ~ 48°F  
High: 61°F ~ Low: 41°F
Print Email link Respond to editor Read comments (13) Share link

Richland school board confronts issue of student cell phone use

Thursday, August 21, 2008

(Photo)
Noreen Hyslop photo Cell phone use by students across the county has become an issue for all county schools. Richland Schools put a new policy into action this week that defines what will and will not be tolerated in the way of not only cell phones, but other electronic devices as well.

It was board members at Richland Schools' turn to vote on the current year's tax rate, following in suit with other county schools. The tax rate hearing, held just prior to Richland's regular August meeting on Tuesday night, was an open meeting of the board, during which members approved a tax rate of 4.0170 per $100 assessed valuation, justified by information from the State Auditor's Office calculations. The 2007-08 tax rate in the district was 3.8167.

Each tax rate is determined by dividing the amount of revenue needed by the current assessed valuation. The result is multiplied by 100, so that the tax rate will be expressed in cents per $100 valuation. Where tax rates will not produce the amounts budgeted, deficit spending will result, Supt. Mike Kiehne explained.

In compliance with the Missouri Schools Improvement Program, board members reviewed Richland's 2008 Summer School Program, which had 129 students enrolled in grades kindergarten through 12th grade.

School board members next got to the meat of Tuesday night's session, as they reviewed, altered and approved the district's policy regarding the use of cell phones by Richland students. While three other student policies were also modified and/or revised with no dialogue from the board, the cell phone issue met with considerable comment, as expected. Inclusion of the new policy regarding cell phone use was tabled at the July board meeting in order to give board members time to digest the ordinance that needed to be put into written form for students.

Kiehne, in presenting his proposed policy to board members Tuesday night, noted that changes in modern technology prompted the policy to be put into place.

"Developments in cell phone technology in recent years," the new policy begins, "have resulted in enhanced communication opportunities. However, the use of cell phones in schools poses increasing risks of school disruptions, bullying, criminal activities and academic dishonesty.

"As a result, beginning with the 2008-09 school year, unauthorized use of cell phones, digital cameras, and similar electronic devices by students will be prohibited on school property, during instructional time, as well as in dressing areas during extra-curricular activities.

"Instructional time is defined as any time students are involved in activities that are a part of the educational process directed by the Richland R-1 School District."

Kiehne then explained to the board the punishment process as stated within the policy. The first offense, he said, would result in a principal-student conference, followed by a principal-parent conference, confiscation of the device, detention, in-school suspension, 1-180 days at the Stoddard County Alternative Center, 1-180 days out of school suspension, expulsion, loss of user privileges, and/or possible notification to law enforcement officials for prosecution.

Upon a subsequent offense, Kiehne went on, the punishment is identical, except that it offers no principal-student conference.

The policy notes also that phones are available in the school offices for parents to contact their students for legitimate reasons.

"The key term within this policy," Kiehne stressed, "is the term 'authorized' and 'unauthorized' use of the devices."

Citing an example of "authorized" usage, Kiehne defined the policy further, stating that in the instance of students traveling on a school-owned bus to basketball games, the use of cell phones would be beneficial, especially in notifying parents of estimated arrival times back on campus.

"The use of digital cameras on campus by students who work on the high school yearbook," he said, "would be another example of authorized use."

While generally meeting with the board's approval, Kiehne still fielded several questions from board members regarding the specifics within the policy and also the possible need for further definition with regard to cell phones, in particular, being present on school property.

Board Member David DeJournett cited a case scenario wherein a student's cell phone might be found inside a locker in the event of a locker search.

"What would happen to that phone?" he asked. Kiehne responded, "It would be confiscated."

Discussion then ensued involving the severity of the consequences in finding a student's phone in an unauthorized capacity on campus.

Member Terry Blair echoed DeJournett's sentiment, stating, "I wouldn't be for confiscating a phone that is turned off, whether it's in a purse or a locker or in their pocket."

Again, Kiehne emphasized the terminology within the policy that refers to "authorized" and "unauthorized" cell phone use and the term, "instructional time."

"I'm encompassing the school day from 8 a.m. until 3:30 p.m. as being instructional time."

Kiehne emphasized, "School districts are realizing that we need to have a policy in place regarding the issue of cell phones and electronic devices and if we can start with banning the unauthorized use of cell phones, then I believe that we can curtail a lot of potential problems. This is not a perfect policy. We don't yet know what is. This is a work in progress right now."

Board members eventually agreed to alter the proposed policy by including the words, "on school property," which would encompass busses and parking lots. A vote followed to adopt the policy with the revisions and with the understanding that the policy will make allowances as circumstances present themselves.

Other policy updates, involving non-discrimination of student's rights, harassment within the school setting, and parental rights to denial of due process, were approved with little fanfare. Updates with regard to regulations were also approved.

Prior to adjourning into executive session for the purpose of hiring and firing, Kiehne brought up the issue of MAP testing and the district's progress with regard to the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) mandate. Kiehne explained that school administrators had met this week with Jamie Holliman from the Department of Education, who advised the district of a three-year plan that will work them out of the District Improvement-Level One status, as granted through the federally mandated NCLB.

In executive session, board members approved the employment of the district's new speech pathologist, Dolly Kluesner. The next meeting of the board will take place on Thursday, September 18, at 7 p.m.


Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on dailystatesman.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

I still think they should be able to bring them to school, what about if your child leaves school and goes to work right after, they need their phone, that is why i pay for it.

-- Posted by dkunk on Thu, Aug 21, 2008, at 12:18 PM

dkunk, why can't they leave them in the car. What kid needs to make a phone call of importance while he is in school. If it's an emergency, go to the office. Pretty simple if you ask me.

-- Posted by BonScott on Thu, Aug 21, 2008, at 3:09 PM

My daughter doesn't drive -she leaves her phone in her backpack - turned off - and texts me when she is on the way home...What is wrong with that? If you ask me, it is a waste of money and time to have the PTB at the school worrying about this sort of bologna. The police have better things to do also - if you SEE a child with their phone on their ear, then worry about it.

-- Posted by MommyinMo on Thu, Aug 21, 2008, at 3:26 PM

if you leave it in the car, some one will steal it, i saw kids last year go into cars and had to call the school from the parking lot, if you leave them in the car, i thought that was bed for them, that is what i have heard, too much heat or cold,and i just dont think it is a big deal to have them, just dont use them till after school.

-- Posted by dkunk on Thu, Aug 21, 2008, at 7:43 PM

Yeah...and never mind kids texting older boyfriends or people in other classes or taking pictures of a test to give to a friend or storing answers to tests or having a stupid parent text or call them and when the kid is disciplined complain that they have the right to talk to their kid. No big deal. I say let them carry them and use them whenever they wish. Screw learning. As if there is a school in the state that doesn't let students use the school phone?

-- Posted by shannonhoon on Thu, Aug 21, 2008, at 10:32 PM

I bet cell phone theft in Essex is a major problem. I don't know how in the world kids survived at school prior to 1996. I would be appalled if my child would have to use the office phone. That is sooooooo 1990s.

-- Posted by BonScott on Fri, Aug 22, 2008, at 12:08 AM

simple, leave the phones at home or gee whiz ,we lived for 70 years without a dang phone glued to our heads.

-- Posted by changedname on Fri, Aug 22, 2008, at 7:03 AM

Oh yeah....forget about another problem.....a phone or other device being stolen and the kid and/or parents expecting the school to help them find it. Not a waste of time, let me get to the bottom of this and find it. Anything so that your little angel can call home as soon as they get on the bus to tell you they are on the bus, sitting in seat #3, sitting with their friend, going down a gravel road, getting close to home, pulling up to the house, getting off the bus, coming to the door, and finally, "home"!

-- Posted by shannonhoon on Fri, Aug 22, 2008, at 10:36 AM

Okay Krunk and mommy in slomo - you obviously have no clue about what these little darlings do with cell phones. Everything from taking pictures of private parts or things in a locker room and sending them out in mass mailings to texting multiple times during class, it happens. The Richland supt is right on as he says that the technology is moving so fast that it is impossible to make a perfect law but we must do something to attempt to get a handle on it.

I for one feel perfectly comfortable using an "oh so yesterday" landline and I will expect my kids to do the same. Parents that think they have to have these to survive are kidding themselves. Whatever convenience these may provide is surpassed in the damage they can do - you won't convince me otherwise. I think they are dangerous and a hinderance to education. I hope krunk and babymomma realize what kids really do with these phones.

man that was like three weeks worth of junk I just got off my trunk - thanks krunk - peace out...

-- Posted by dimebag darrell on Fri, Aug 22, 2008, at 10:10 PM

OK wait and hear me out, I am not saying that the things need to be on, yes they need to be off during school hours, and not used at all, i know what SOME kids do with them, but i also know that mine does not, want to know why, because i look on line at when he uses it and for what then if it something i feel he should not then we talk, but he does not have text and he has no pictures, it is used to call me when he gets to school and when he leaves for work from school, calls when he gets off work and I know he is on his way home, my son is a new driver, he does not use it when he is driving he only uses it before he gets going, I do know that some use it in a bad way, that is why i think that if the school finds the phone and it is on then Yes action needs to be taken, i believe they should be able to have it only off during the day of school hours, and if the school finds it on then take it, i do believe that learning comes 1st, and i do know that i didn't have one when i was just driving, but if i did mom would have known were i was and what i was doing, the only reason my son has it is so we can get in touch with him when he is not home, YES, I am over protective, but as a mom i have a right to be. when he is grown and on his one i hope i can look back and say i did a good job.

-- Posted by dkunk on Sun, Aug 24, 2008, at 4:39 PM

dkunk, that is great. I think you're in a fantasy world however, if you think your son doesn't talk on his cell while he is driving. But if he doesn't, kudos to him.

I do think you might have been on your cell phone during English class though. Try putting a couple of periods in that page long paragraph next time. It makes it easier to read.

-- Posted by BonScott on Sun, Aug 24, 2008, at 6:04 PM

Headbangers, you did a good job of posting comments on this blog. LOVED IT!

-- Posted by goat lady on Mon, Aug 25, 2008, at 8:01 PM

Thanks to the GOAT!!!!!!!!! We have won her over!!!!!!

YES! Mission Accomplished.

-- Posted by shannonhoon on Mon, Aug 25, 2008, at 11:40 PM


Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration. If you already have an account on this site, enter your username and password below. Otherwise, click here to register.

Username:

Password:  (Forgot your password?)

Your comments:
Please be respectful of others and try to stay on topic.