Dexter, Missouri · Friday, July 30, 2010
[Nameplate] Fair ~ 75°F  
High: 91°F ~
Print Email link Respond to editor Read comments (5)

Bayer guilty; $2M to local farmers

Tuesday, December 8, 2009
A St. Louis jury found Germany-based Bayer CropScience AG and several of its affiliates negligent in the first of several "bellwether trials" scheduled for the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, and awarded over $2 million to two Stoddard County long-grain rice farmers. The jury found that Bayer's genetically modified rice had harmed their crops and livelihood, said a press release.

Ken Bell of Bell City was awarded $1.95 million in compensatory damages, and fellow rice farmer John Hunter of Essex was awarded $53,336 in compensatory damages. The jury did not award any punitive damages.

At issue was a genetically altered variety of rice that was found to have contaminated rice fields in several states. In August 2006, Bayer CropScience, part of BayerAG in Leverkusen, Germany, found trace amounts of a genetically modified rice, LLRICE601, in commercial rice samples taken in the U.S.A. and Europe. The findings resulted in a several countries halting U.S. rice imports, and new testing regulations were instituted by numerous others. LLRICE 601 was developed between 1998 and 2001 by Aventis CropScience and its predecessor company. In 2002, Aventis CropScience was taken over by Bayer. The rice was developed because it is resistant to Liberty Link herbicide, a product of Bayer. The new strain of rice would have allowed farmers to treat the crop with the herbicide to control weeds and grasses while not impacting the rice itself.

"Discovery of the contamination led to a dramatic drop in U.S. rice prices, as the European Union stopped purchasing U.S. rice," said a statement from the press release. "The farmers suffered economic loss due to the much lower demand for their rice since 2006, when the contaminated rice was discovered."

Farmers from Missouri, Arkansas, Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi filed more than 1,000 lawsuits against Bayer as a result of the loss of overseas markets. A Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation consolidated the cases in December of 2006. Two attorneys, Don Downing of the St. Louis plaintiff law firm Gray, Ritter & Graham, P.C., was named Co-Lead Counsel, Co-Interim Class Counsel and Plaintiff's Liaison Counsel and Adam J. Levitt, a partner in the law firm of Wolf, Haldenstein, Adler, Freeman & Herz LLC, was appointed Plaintiffs' Designated Co-Lead and Co-Interim Class Counsel.

Legal representatives with Bayer filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuits because of a lack of personal jurisdiction. Perry denied that motion, citing subsidiaries in the US as reason for jurisdiction.

The attorneys in the case filed a consolidated class action complaint in 2007. Eastern District of Missouri Judge Catherine Perry denied the class action status, stating, "plaintiffs' claims varied too much to fit as a class action." She set up a series of trials that have been called "Bellwether" cases and the Missouri trial was the first. She also appointed former federal judge Stephen Limbaugh to work with the two sides in reaching a settlement.

Downing maintained during the trial that Bayer's negligence has cost Bell more than $2.2 million. He went on to say that Hunter had quit rice farming all together after suffering losses of $50,000.

Downing said Bell had 6,000 acres planted in rice when the contamination was found in 2006, while Hunter had 500 acres.

"We're very pleased that the jury returned verdicts in favor of our clients, Ken Bell, Johnny Hunter, and their family operations," said Downing. "The verdicts are wonderful news for all rice farmers who were victims of Bayer's conduct."

"The jury spoke loud and clear that Bayer was negligent and is responsible for the damages suffered by Bell and Hunter," Downing stated. "That harm is no different than what many other rice farmers across the South have suffered. We look forward to seeking justice for them in the upcoming trials."

The next bellwether case is set for Jan. 11, 2010 which involved farmers from Arkansas and Mississippi. That trial will also be held in St. Louis.


Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on dailystatesman.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

Genetically altered = BAD!!! I am glad these farmers were compensated.

-- Posted by mizzou_mom on Tue, Dec 8, 2009, at 2:51 PM

You can't mess around with mother nature or our food crops, glad they had to pay.

-- Posted by Dexterite1 on Tue, Dec 8, 2009, at 7:30 PM

I just hope they can collect their money!

-- Posted by goat lady on Tue, Dec 8, 2009, at 8:02 PM

Man has altered the genetics of plants and animals SIGNIFFIGANTLY over the course of the last 10,000 years.

My little mini daschund should be a prime example to all of you of the 100,000 years spent domesticating the dog, mans longest relationship. Very much a hound dog but compleatly usless AS a hound dog!

-- Posted by bobby wayne on Wed, Dec 9, 2009, at 12:22 AM

So very true. bobby wayne, it wasn't until I learned about the fairly recent fad of owning miniature horses and how they were 'made', that I paid much attention to that sort of thing, but once I found out about that, I was appalled and angered. Just because man CAN do something doesn't mean he SHOULD do it, if you follow my drift there...and another thing I have a problem with is the way we sometimes eradicate certain pests...by bringing in another 'something' higher on the food chain that is a predator of said pest...okay, the pest is eradicated but now we have the predator to deal with, so we bring in something even higher...and on and on and on it goes..

-- Posted by BarbaraNTexas on Wed, Dec 9, 2009, at 8:07 AM


Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration. If you already have an account on this site, enter your username and password below. Otherwise, click here to register.

Username:

Password:  (Forgot your password?)

Your comments:
Please be respectful of others and try to stay on topic.